ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs HD Graphics (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Braswell) with Radeon HD 4870 X2, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics (Braswell)
2015
0.58
ATI HD 4870 X2
2008, $550
1 GB GDDR5, 286 Watt
3.17
+447%

HD 4870 X2 outperforms HD Graphics (Braswell) by a whopping 447% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1278805
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.14
Power efficiencyno data0.84
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBraswellR700
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)12 August 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$550

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16800 ×2
Core clock speed320 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data956 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data286 Watt
Texture fill rateno data28.00 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data1.12 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data16 ×2
TMUsno data40 ×2
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB ×2
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115.2 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.210.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Valorant 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−428%
95−100
+428%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Valorant 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Valorant 27−30
−436%
150−160
+436%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−436%
75−80
+436%
Valorant 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 3.17
Recency 1 April 2015 12 August 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm

HD Graphics (Braswell) has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4870 X2, on the other hand, has a 447% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 4870 X2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 18 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 48 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Braswell) or Radeon HD 4870 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.