GeForce4 460 Go vs HD Graphics (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics (Braswell) and GeForce4 460 Go, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics (Braswell)
2015
0.57
+5600%

HD Graphics (Braswell) outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 5600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12661569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameBraswellNV17 A5
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)14 October 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162
Core clock speed320 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.000
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.28.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 27−30
+21.7%
21−24
−21.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics (Braswell) is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics (Braswell) performs better in 20 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.01
Recency 1 April 2015 14 October 2002
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics (Braswell) has a 5600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
NVIDIA GeForce4 460 Go
GeForce4 460 Go

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 17 votes

Rate HD Graphics (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics (Braswell) or GeForce4 460 Go, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.