Tesla V100 SXM2 vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking827not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.65no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 January 2017 (8 years ago)21 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1925120
Core clock speed350 MHz1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00438.4
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3128
TMUs24320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4HBM2
Maximum RAM amount64 GB16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2017 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 250 Watt

HD Graphics 630 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 630 and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1430 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 46 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 630 or Tesla V100 SXM2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.