ATI Radeon X1950 PRO vs HD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 630 with Radeon X1950 PRO, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 630
2017
64 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
3.11
+972%

HD Graphics 630 outperforms ATI X1950 PRO by a whopping 972% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7591337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.210.30
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2RV570
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt66 Watt
Texture fill rate24.006.900
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs312
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared690 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data44.16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 630 3.11
+972%
ATI X1950 PRO 0.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 630 1197
+969%
ATI X1950 PRO 112

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
1440p64
+1180%
5−6
−1180%
4K19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 6 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Hitman 3 8−9 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Metro Exodus 10 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Hitman 3 8−9 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Metro Exodus 4 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Hitman 3 8−9 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+1200%
3−4
−1200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+1800%
1−2
−1800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

This is how HD Graphics 630 and ATI X1950 PRO compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 630 is 1400% faster in 1080p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 1180% faster in 1440p
  • HD Graphics 630 is 1800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 0.29
Recency 1 January 2017 1 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 66 Watt

HD Graphics 630 has a 972.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1950 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 630 is a notebook card while Radeon X1950 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 630
HD Graphics 630
ATI Radeon X1950 PRO
Radeon X1950 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1236 votes

Rate HD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 147 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.