Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta vs HD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking908not rated
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Power efficiency11.48no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2NV5 B5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (9 years ago)22 March 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.000.2
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs242

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4SDR
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared133 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.064 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 250 nm

HD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 620 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3044 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 14 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 620 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.