Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS vs HD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking902not rated
Place by popularity90not in top-100
Power efficiency11.36no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 August 2016 (9 years ago)3 September 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192768
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared8448 MHz
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 3 September 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 20 Watt

HD Graphics 620 has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 620 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3006 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 44 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 620 or Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.