RTX PRO 6000 vs HD Graphics 610

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 610 with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 610
2016
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 5 Watt
1.79

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms HD Graphics 610 by a whopping 4454% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.349.62
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT1GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9624064
Core clock speed300 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors189 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate10.801,810
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs2176
TMUs12752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount32 GB96 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 610 1.79
RTX PRO 6000 81.52
+4454%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 610 712
RTX PRO 6000 32435
+4455%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7
−4186%
300−350
+4186%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Far Cry 5 3
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Fortnite 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
Valorant 35−40
−4359%
1650−1700
+4359%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−4344%
1600−1650
+4344%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Dota 2 12
−4067%
500−550
+4067%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Fortnite 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 35−40
−4359%
1650−1700
+4359%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Dead Island 2 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Dota 2 11
−4445%
500−550
+4445%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−4400%
450−500
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%
Valorant 35−40
−4359%
1650−1700
+4359%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−4186%
300−310
+4186%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−4067%
500−550
+4067%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−4067%
500−550
+4067%
Valorant 12−14
−4067%
500−550
+4067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dead Island 2 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−4275%
700−750
+4275%
Valorant 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Dota 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%

This is how HD Graphics 610 and RTX PRO 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 is 4186% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.79 81.52
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 600 Watt

HD Graphics 610 has 11900% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 4454.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 610 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 610 is a notebook card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 577 votes

Rate HD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 36 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 610 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.