To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
AMD Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x1
- Core clock speed 300
- Max video memory System Shared
- Memory type System Shared
- Memory clock speed System Shared
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed 720 / 650
- Max video memory
- Memory type DDR3
- Memory clock speed 1800 - 2000
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 742 | 740 |
Value for money | 0.14 | 0.25 |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015) | no data |
GPU code name | Broadwell GT3 | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 (8 years old) | 1 August 2013 (9 years old) |
Current price | $286 | $90 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 720 / 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 / 28 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 | no data |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on HD Graphics 6000 and Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | no data |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | no data |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Shared memory | + | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
OpenCL | 2.0 | no data |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
HD Graphics 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 10% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 6000 by 44% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
HD Graphics 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 20% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Score
Benchmark coverage: 13%
HD Graphics 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 27% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 13%
HD Graphics 6000 outperforms Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by 10% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 15
+15.4%
| 13
−15.4%
|
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
−10%
|
10−12
+10%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 2.16 | 2.20 |
Recency | 5 January 2015 | 1 August 2013 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 768 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by NVIDIA
According to our data, the nearest equivalent to Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics by NVIDIA is GeForce GT 445M, which is slower by 3% and lower by 5 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon HD 8650G + HD 8570M Dual Graphics:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.