GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs HD Graphics 6000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 6000 and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 6000 by a whopping 1832% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 907 | 121 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 10.32 | 59.82 |
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 (2014−2015) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Broadwell GT3 | GB207 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 September 2014 (10 years ago) | 24 June 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 2520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 45.60 | 201.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 12.9 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 6 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.4 |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 15
−1767%
| 280−290
+1767%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−5350%
|
210−220
+5350%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2225%
|
90−95
+2225%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−1286%
|
95−100
+1286%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−2133%
|
130−140
+2133%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−5350%
|
210−220
+5350%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2225%
|
90−95
+2225%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−2420%
|
120−130
+2420%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1800%
|
170−180
+1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1291%
|
150−160
+1291%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−4033%
|
120−130
+4033%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−1286%
|
95−100
+1286%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1309%
|
150−160
+1309%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−490%
|
230−240
+490%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−2133%
|
130−140
+2133%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−5350%
|
210−220
+5350%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 40−45
−562%
|
270−280
+562%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2225%
|
90−95
+2225%
|
| Dota 2 | 17
−1665%
|
300−310
+1665%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−2420%
|
120−130
+2420%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1800%
|
170−180
+1800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1291%
|
150−160
+1291%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 3−4
−4033%
|
120−130
+4033%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−1286%
|
95−100
+1286%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 4−5
−3150%
|
130−140
+3150%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−3067%
|
95−100
+3067%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1309%
|
150−160
+1309%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1675%
|
140−150
+1675%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−490%
|
230−240
+490%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−2133%
|
130−140
+2133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2225%
|
90−95
+2225%
|
| Dota 2 | 15
−1767%
|
280−290
+1767%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−2420%
|
120−130
+2420%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
−1291%
|
150−160
+1291%
|
| God of War | 7−8
−1286%
|
95−100
+1286%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−1309%
|
150−160
+1309%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
−1675%
|
140−150
+1675%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
−1823%
|
750−800
+1823%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
−1800%
|
170−180
+1800%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6
−1900%
|
100−105
+1900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
−1879%
|
270−280
+1879%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 20−22
−1650%
|
350−400
+1650%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
−1531%
|
260−270
+1531%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−4600%
|
45−50
+4600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−4700%
|
95−100
+4700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2180%
|
110−120
+2180%
|
| God of War | 1−2
−5100%
|
50−55
+5100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−3700%
|
75−80
+3700%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−2525%
|
100−110
+2525%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
−438%
|
85−90
+438%
|
| Valorant | 10−11
−2320%
|
240−250
+2320%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 4−5
−1775%
|
75−80
+1775%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5200%
|
50−55
+5200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−7500%
|
75−80
+7500%
|
| God of War | 1−2
−3400%
|
35−40
+3400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−1700%
|
50−55
+1700%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 3−4
−1633%
|
50−55
+1633%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 6000 and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile is 1767% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 7500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile performs better in 51 tests (88%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (12%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.03 | 39.22 |
| Recency | 5 September 2014 | 24 June 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
HD Graphics 6000 has 233.3% lower power consumption.
RTX 5050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1832% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 6000 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
