Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs HD Graphics 5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking975not rated
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Power efficiency7.01no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Raven
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)13 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192704
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.4057.20
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS1.83 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2444

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 13 February 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 5500 has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Vega 11 Embedded, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5500 and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5500 is a notebook card while Radeon Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1607 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 18 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.