GeForce2 MX 200 vs HD Graphics 5500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking974not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.02no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2NV11 B2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)3 March 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.400.7
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.328 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.41.2
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 3 March 2001
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics 5500 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5500 and GeForce2 MX 200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5500 is a notebook card while GeForce2 MX 200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200
GeForce2 MX 200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1595 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 28 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.