ATI Radeon HD 4650 vs HD Graphics 5300

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5300 with Radeon HD 4650, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 5300
2014
15 Watt
1.01
+65.6%

HD Graphics 5300 outperforms ATI HD 4650 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11051204
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.790.90
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)10 September 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192320
Core clock speed300 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2019.20
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data193 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 5300 1.01
+65.6%
ATI HD 4650 0.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5300 402
+66.1%
ATI HD 4650 242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Full HD7
+75%
4−5
−75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2
+100%
1−2
−100%
World of Tanks 20
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
World of Tanks 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Valorant 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

This is how HD Graphics 5300 and ATI HD 4650 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5300 is 67% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 5300 is 75% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 0.61
Recency 5 September 2014 10 September 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 48 Watt

HD Graphics 5300 has a 65.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 5300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5300 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4650 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5300
HD Graphics 5300
ATI Radeon HD 4650
Radeon HD 4650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 33 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 235 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 5300 or Radeon HD 4650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.