Iris Plus Graphics vs HD Graphics 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5300 with Iris Plus Graphics, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 5300
2014
15 Watt
1.03

Iris Plus Graphics outperforms HD Graphics 5300 by a whopping 356% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1107646
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2032.00
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPS1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 5300 1.03
Iris Plus Graphics 4.70
+356%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5300 398
Iris Plus Graphics 1814
+356%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p5
−320%
21−24
+320%
Full HD8
−338%
35−40
+338%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

This is how HD Graphics 5300 and Iris Plus Graphics compete in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics is 320% faster in 900p
  • Iris Plus Graphics is 338% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 4.70
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics has a 356.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Plus Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5300 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5300 is a notebook card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5300
HD Graphics 5300
Intel Iris Plus Graphics
Iris Plus Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 32 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 345 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.