ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs HD Graphics 5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1165not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.98no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)no data
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 September 2014 (11 years ago)1 January 1993 (33 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed300 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.3072 TFLOPSno data
ROPs31
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusVLB
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedVRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 2014 1 January 1993
Chip lithography 14 nm 800 nm

HD Graphics 5300 has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 5614% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5300 and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5300 is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 35 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 5300 or Graphics Ultra Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.