ATI Graphics Ultra Pro vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking982not rated
Place by popularity64not in top-100
Power efficiency6.53no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)no data
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Mach32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 January 1993 (32 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed400 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs21
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusVLB
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedVRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)None
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 1 January 1993
Chip lithography 22 nm 800 nm

HD Graphics 4600 has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3536.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4600 and Graphics Ultra Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook graphics card while Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2995 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or Graphics Ultra Pro, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.