UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs HD Graphics 530

Place in performance ranking	784	729
Place by popularity	77	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.16	no data
Architecture	Gen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)	Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code name	Skylake GT2	Rocket Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 August 2015 (8 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$526	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	32
Core clock speed	350 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	27.60	no data
Floating-point performance	403.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 530 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface

PCIe 3.0 x1

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	no data
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 530 2.59

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 3.04
+17.4%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms HD Graphics 530 by 17% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 530 6831
+33.1%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 5134

HD Graphics 530 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by 33% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 530 1362

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2811
+106%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms HD Graphics 530 by 106% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 530 935

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 2175
+133%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms HD Graphics 530 by 133% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

HD Graphics 530 7500

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 11315
+50.9%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms HD Graphics 530 by 51% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

HD Graphics 530 80242
+58.5%

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) 50628

HD Graphics 530 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by 58% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14 −64.3%	23 +64.3%
1440p	16−18 −31.3%	21 +31.3%
4K	7 −28.6%	9 +28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	6 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −50%	6 +50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −40%	7−8 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −133%	7−8 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how HD Graphics 530 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 64.3% faster than HD Graphics 530 in 1080p
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 31.3% faster than HD Graphics 530 in 1440p
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 28.6% faster than HD Graphics 530 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 530 is 20% faster than the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake).
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 133% faster than the HD Graphics 530.

All in all, in popular games: