ATI FireGL X1-256 vs HD Graphics 530

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking893not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.26no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2R300
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)1 July 2002 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192no data
Core clock speed350 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt37 Watt
Texture fill rate22.802.600
Floating-point processing power0.3648 TFLOPSno data
ROPs38
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount64 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared310 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data19.84 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 64 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 37 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 146.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 530 and FireGL X1-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL X1-256 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 530
HD Graphics 530
ATI FireGL X1-256
FireGL X1-256

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1881 votes

Rate HD Graphics 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL X1-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 530 or FireGL X1-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.