Radeon R7 M365 vs HD Graphics 520

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking864not rated
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Power efficiency9.87no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2Litho
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)5 May 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192384
Core clock speed300 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz960 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate21.6023.04
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs38
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.0Not Listed
Vulkan+-
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 3 months, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and Radeon R7 M365. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook card while Radeon R7 M365 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
AMD Radeon R7 M365
Radeon R7 M365

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3116 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.