Radeon R7 M365 vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1226not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.24no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1Litho
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz960 MHz
Number of transistors189 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.80023.04
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs28
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data
Eyefinity-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX® 12
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.0Not Listed
Vulkan1.3-
Mantle-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 500 has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 500 and Radeon R7 M365. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 M365 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 784 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 500 or Radeon R7 M365, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.