RTX A4000 vs HD Graphics 520

Aggregated performance score

HD Graphics 520
2015
32768 Mb DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
2.15

RTX A4000 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 2233% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking82052
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.1812.95
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2GA104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$309 $1112

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX A4000 has 7094% better value for money than HD Graphics 520.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores246144
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors189 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate25.20299.5

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 520 and RTX A4000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 520 2.15
RTX A4000 50.15
+2233%

RTX A4000 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 2233% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 520 831
RTX A4000 19410
+2236%

RTX A4000 outperforms HD Graphics 520 by 2236% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p20
−2150%
450−500
+2150%
Full HD11
−2173%
250−260
+2173%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−2122%
200−210
+2122%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%

This is how HD Graphics 520 and RTX A4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 is 2150% faster than HD Graphics 520 in 900p
  • RTX A4000 is 2173% faster than HD Graphics 520 in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.15 50.15
Recency 1 September 2015 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 140 Watt

The RTX A4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 520 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook card while RTX A4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
NVIDIA RTX A4000
RTX A4000

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2573 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 560 votes

Rate RTX A4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.