Radeon R5 240 OEM vs HD Graphics 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking960not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1Oland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 November 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12384
Core clock speed300 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz780 MHz
Number of transistors189 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate11.4018.72
Floating-point processing power0.1824 gflops0.599 gflops
ROPs38
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.971.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 510 and Radeon R5 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while Radeon R5 240 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
Radeon R5 240 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 364 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 518 votes

Rate Radeon R5 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.