ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs HD Graphics 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking966not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.42no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1RV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)21 February 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96120
Core clock speed300 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate10.805.600
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS0.168 TFLOPS
ROPs34
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 21 February 2008
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 510 and Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 384 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 510 or Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.