Quadro FX 3000G vs HD Graphics 510

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking957not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.48no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1NV35
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)22 July 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.803.200
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared425 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data27.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

HD Graphics 510 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 510 and Quadro FX 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook card while Quadro FX 3000G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 510
HD Graphics 510
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000G
Quadro FX 3000G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 369 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.