RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs HD Graphics 505

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 505 with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 505
2016
8 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 10 Watt
0.81

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms HD Graphics 505 by a whopping 8281% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.8878.13
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1.5GB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2016 (9 years ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1448960
Core clock speed200 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors189 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate11.70374.4
Floating-point processing power0.1872 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs18280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L1 Cacheno data8.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1125 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 505 0.81
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+8281%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 505 359
Samples: 220
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+8262%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−8233%
750−800
+8233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8025%
650−700
+8025%
Valorant 30−33
−8233%
2500−2550
+8233%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−8161%
1900−1950
+8161%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%
Dota 2 14−16
−8114%
1150−1200
+8114%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8025%
650−700
+8025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Valorant 30−33
−8233%
2500−2550
+8233%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%
Dota 2 14−16
−8114%
1150−1200
+8114%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−8025%
650−700
+8025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
Valorant 30−33
−8233%
2500−2550
+8233%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−8233%
750−800
+8233%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−8233%
1250−1300
+8233%
Valorant 5−6
−7900%
400−450
+7900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−7900%
160−170
+7900%

This is how HD Graphics 505 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is 8233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 67.89
Recency 1 September 2016 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 70 Watt

HD Graphics 505 has 600% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, on the other hand, has a 8281.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 505 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 505 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 283 votes

Rate HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 505 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.