Radeon RX 7700S vs HD Graphics 5000

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5000 and Radeon RX 7700S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 5000
2013
30 Watt
1.52

RX 7700S outperforms HD Graphics 5000 by a whopping 2493% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking972110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.5327.48
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3202048
Core clock speed200 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors1,300 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate40.00320.0
Floating-point processing power0.64 TFLOPS20.48 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs40128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 5000 1.52
RX 7700S 39.42
+2493%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5000 586
RX 7700S 15204
+2495%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 5000 1034
RX 7700S 37918
+3569%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 5000 716
RX 7700S 24246
+3289%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1150%
125
+1150%
1440p2−3
−2950%
61
+2950%
4K1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
70−75
+1725%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
70−75
+1725%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4300%
85−90
+4300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3300%
100−110
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6433%
190−200
+6433%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1367%
85−90
+1367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1033%
170−180
+1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1813%
150−160
+1813%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−297%
130−140
+297%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
70−75
+1725%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4300%
85−90
+4300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3300%
100−110
+3300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6433%
190−200
+6433%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1367%
85−90
+1367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1033%
170−180
+1033%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1988%
167
+1988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−673%
85−90
+673%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−297%
130−140
+297%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1350%
85−90
+1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1975%
80−85
+1975%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1725%
70−75
+1725%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4300%
85−90
+4300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6433%
190−200
+6433%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1367%
85−90
+1367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1033%
170−180
+1033%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1700%
144
+1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−664%
84
+664%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−297%
130−140
+297%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3050%
60−65
+3050%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2300%
45−50
+2300%
Hitman 3 7−8
−671%
50−55
+671%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1720%
90−95
+1720%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−2729%
190−200
+2729%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1675%
70−75
+1675%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 27−30
Far Cry 5 0−1 24−27

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1133%
35−40
+1133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 92
+0%
92
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+0%
43
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
+0%
48
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 5000 and RX 7700S compete in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is 1150% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7700S is 2950% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7700S is 4900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700S is 7900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7700S is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.52 39.42
Recency 27 May 2013 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 100 Watt

HD Graphics 5000 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

RX 7700S, on the other hand, has a 2493.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 266.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7700S is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5000
HD Graphics 5000
AMD Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 181 vote

Rate HD Graphics 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 102 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.