UHD Graphics 920 vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1217not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.17no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1Ice Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.800no data
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has 50% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 920, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 500 and UHD Graphics 920. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 500 is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 920 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 500
Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 773 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 85 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 500 or UHD Graphics 920, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.