Tegra K1 GPU vs HD Graphics 500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1226not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.24no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameApollo Lake GT1GK20A
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)15 October 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
Core clock speed200 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz951 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate7.8007.608
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs128
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.6ES 3.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA-3.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 15 October 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

HD Graphics 500 has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Tegra K1 GPU, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 500 and Tegra K1 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 793 votes

Rate HD Graphics 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Tegra K1 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 500 or Tegra K1 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.