Radeon HD 4650 vs HD Graphics 500

Place in performance ranking	1116	1155
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.08	no data
Architecture	Gen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Apollo Lake	RV730
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2016 (7 years ago)	10 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	$414	$154

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 500 and ATI HD 4650 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	12	320
Core clock speed	300 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	700 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.000	19.20
Floating-point performance	144.0 gflops	384.0 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 500 and Radeon HD 4650 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	193 mm
Width	no data	1-slot

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.97	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 500 0.75
+23%

ATI HD 4650 0.61

HD Graphics 500 outperforms Radeon HD 4650 by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 500 298
+25.2%

ATI HD 4650 238

HD Graphics 500 outperforms Radeon HD 4650 by 25% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10 +25%	8−9 −25%
1440p	1	0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Metro Exodus	1−2	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Hitman 3	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2	0−1
Hitman 3	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%

This is how HD Graphics 500 and ATI HD 4650 compete in popular games:

HD Graphics 500 is 25% faster than ATI HD 4650 in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	0.75	0.61
Recency	1 September 2016	10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	48 Watt