HD Graphics P4000 vs HD Graphics 500

Place in the ranking	1155	1026
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.96	2.05
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code name	Apollo Lake GT1	Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	14 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	128
Core clock speed	200 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	650 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.800	20.00
Floating-point processing power	0.1248 TFLOPS	0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	1
TMUs	12	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	System Shared	System Shared
Memory clock speed	System Shared	System Shared
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.0
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 500 0.78

HD Graphics P4000 1.34
+71.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 500 298

HD Graphics P4000 516
+73.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	9 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
1440p	1 +0%	1−2 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	2 −50%	3−4 +50%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4 −50%	6−7 +50%
Fortnite	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
World of Tanks	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	5 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
World of Tanks	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Valorant	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%