Tesla C2090 vs HD Graphics 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking982not rated
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Power efficiency6.54no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160512
Core clock speed400 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0041.66
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2064
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared924 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data177.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 May 2013 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 250 Watt

HD Graphics 4600 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 81.8% more advanced lithography process, and 455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4600 and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4600 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
NVIDIA Tesla C2090
Tesla C2090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2980 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or Tesla C2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.