ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330 vs HD Graphics 4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4600 and Mobility Radeon HD 4330, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 4600
2013
45 Watt
1.80
+445%

HD Graphics 4600 outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4330 by a whopping 445% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9241311
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency6.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2M92
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16080
Core clock speed400 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.003.600
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS0.072 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data9.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 4600 1.80
+445%
ATI Mobility HD 4330 0.33

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 4600 5203
+693%
ATI Mobility HD 4330 656

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Full HD11
+450%
2−3
−450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 12
+500%
2−3
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27
+92.9%
14−16
−92.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 22
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 35−40
+42.3%
24−27
−42.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Valorant 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD Graphics 4600 and ATI Mobility HD 4330 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4600 is 600% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 4600 is 450% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 4600 is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4600 is ahead in 31 test (94%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.80 0.33
Recency 27 May 2013 9 January 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 55 nm

HD Graphics 4600 has a 445.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4330 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4600
HD Graphics 4600
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4330
Mobility Radeon HD 4330

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2580 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4600 or Mobility Radeon HD 4330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.