Radeon Pro 570X vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1076not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.80no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 September 2013 (12 years ago)18 March 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1601792
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1105 MHz
Number of transistors392 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate19.00123.8
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS3.96 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs20112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data217.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2013 18 March 2019
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 120 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has 500% lower power consumption.

Pro 570X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon Pro 570X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 570X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
AMD Radeon Pro 570X
Radeon Pro 570X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1638 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 46 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 570X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or Radeon Pro 570X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.