ATI Radeon IGP 345M vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10321542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.65no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2013 (11 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160no data
Core clock speed200 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Wattno data
Texture fill rate19.000.37
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs22
TMUs202

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.31.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4400 522
+26000%
ATI IGP 345M 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12no data
Full HD10no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5 no data
Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Fortnite 11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5 no data
Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 15 no data
Fortnite 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 7−8 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Dota 2 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2013 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 22 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics 4400 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 718.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon IGP 345M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
ATI Radeon IGP 345M
Radeon IGP 345M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1497 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 345M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or Radeon IGP 345M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.