Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1023not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2Tiger Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 June 2013 (11 years ago)2 September 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20640
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate22.0044.00
Floating-point processing power0.352 gflops1.408 gflops
ROPs220
TMUs2040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2013 2 September 2020
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU has an age advantage of 7 years, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4400 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1341 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 138 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.