ATI FireGL V3600 vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1037not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.64no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2RV630
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2013 (11 years ago)28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160120
Core clock speed200 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt73 Watt
Texture fill rate19.004.800
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS0.144 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2013 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 73 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 265% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4400 and FireGL V3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook card while FireGL V3600 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
ATI FireGL V3600
FireGL V3600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1501 vote

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or FireGL V3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.