ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470 vs HD Graphics 4200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 4200 and Mobility Radeon HD 3470, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD Graphics 4200 outperforms Mobility HD 3470 by a whopping 310% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1167 | 1421 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 17.31 | 1.41 |
Architecture | Generation 7.5 (2013) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
GPU code name | Haswell GT2 | M82 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 2 September 2013 (12 years ago) | 7 January 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 160 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 680 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 392 million | 181 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 12 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 17.00 | 2.720 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.272 TFLOPS | 0.0544 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 2 | 4 |
TMUs | 20 | 4 |
L2 Cache | no data | 64 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | Ring Bus | MXM-II |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 256 MB |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | N/A |
Vulkan | + | N/A |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 8
+700%
| 1−2
−700%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Full HD
Medium
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+24%
|
24−27
−24%
|
Full HD
High
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 13
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+24%
|
24−27
−24%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+28.6%
|
7−8
−28.6%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
Valorant | 30−35
+24%
|
24−27
−24%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
1440p
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K
High
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
4K
Ultra
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 4200 and ATI Mobility HD 3470 compete in popular games:
- HD Graphics 4200 is 700% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 4200 is 400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics 4200 performs better in 27 tests (93%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (7%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.86 | 0.21 |
Recency | 2 September 2013 | 7 January 2008 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 12 Watt |
HD Graphics 4200 has a 309.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The HD Graphics 4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 3470 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.