GeForce Go 7700 vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4200 and GeForce Go 7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 4200
2013
4 Watt
0.91
+160%

HD Graphics 4200 outperforms Go 7700 by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11851349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.52no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2G73
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 September 2013 (12 years ago)1 August 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16017
Core clock speed200 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors392 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.005.400
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPSno data
ROPs28
TMUs2012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data16 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.32.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+167%
3−4
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 4200 and Go 7700 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4200 is 167% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 4200 is 400% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Go 7700 is 8% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4200 performs better in 24 tests (89%)
  • Go 7700 performs better in 1 test (4%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.35
Recency 2 September 2013 1 August 2006
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm

HD Graphics 4200 has a 160% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 309% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7700 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 45 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4200 or GeForce Go 7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.