GeForce 7000M vs HD Graphics 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4200 and GeForce 7000M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 4200
2013
4 Watt
0.91
+2933%

HD Graphics 4200 outperforms 7000M by a whopping 2933% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11761548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.46no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)no data
GPU code nameHaswell GT2C67
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 September 2013 (12 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1603
Core clock speed200 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.272 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2no data
TMUs20no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedshared Memory
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)shared Memory
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Valorant 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Valorant 30−35
+34.8%
21−24
−34.8%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 4200 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 4200 performs better in 20 tests (95%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.91 0.03
Recency 2 September 2013 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm

HD Graphics 4200 has a 2933.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 309.1% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7000M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics 4200
NVIDIA GeForce 7000M
GeForce 7000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 42 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 23 votes

Rate GeForce 7000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4200 or GeForce 7000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.