Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs HD Graphics 4000

Place in performance ranking	1030	1185
Place by popularity	33	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.13	no data
Architecture	Gen. 7 Ivy Bridge (2011−2012)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	Ivy Bridge	RV730
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	23 March 2011 (13 years ago)	10 September 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	$91	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD Graphics 4000 and ATI HD 4650 AGP have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	320
Core clock speed	350 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	22 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	19.20
Floating-point performance	33.6 gflops	384.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 4000 and Radeon HD 4650 AGP compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	512 MB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	12.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (11_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	5.0	4.1
OpenGL	4.0	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.80	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4000 1.17
+117%

ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.54

HD Graphics 4000 outperforms Radeon HD 4650 AGP by 117% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 4000 454
+119%

ATI HD 4650 AGP 207

HD Graphics 4000 outperforms Radeon HD 4650 AGP by 119% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	12 +140%	5−6 −140%
Full HD	10 +150%	4−5 −150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
+200%

1−2

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Hitman 3	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2	0−1