Radeon R7 Graphics vs HD Graphics 400

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1038not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Spectre
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)11 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Current price$710 $150

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed320 MHz686 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz980 MHz
Number of transistors189 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.68031.36
Floating-point performance134.4 gflops526.8 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1IGP
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.0
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 April 2015 11 January 2014
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB System Shared
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Radeon R7 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Radeon R7 Graphics

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 363 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1125 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.