HD Graphics 12EU vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.33no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 5.75 (2010)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Ironlake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
Core clock speed320 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million177 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2006.396
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS0.1023 TFLOPS
ROPs22
TMUs1212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusQPI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.32.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 483.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and HD Graphics 12EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics 12EU is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
Intel HD Graphics 12EU
HD Graphics 12EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 454 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics 12EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or HD Graphics 12EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.