Matrox G450 x2 MMS vs HD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1227not rated
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency1.58no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Condor
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate6.3000.25
Floating-point processing power0.1008 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12
TMUs62

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared332 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)6.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.0None
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics has a 718.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics and Matrox G450 x2 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics
Matrox G450 x2 MMS
G450 x2 MMS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 2964 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox G450 x2 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics or Matrox G450 x2 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.