ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1139not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.31no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1RV620
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9640
Core clock speed320 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2002.000
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x1
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LDDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and FireMV 2260 PCIe x1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 454 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or FireMV 2260 PCIe x1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.