CMP 50HX vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1138not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.36no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed320 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200296.6
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs12192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data560.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 250 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 446 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 67 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.