Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1079not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.82no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Core clock speed320 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz2250 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate7.680144.0
Floating-point processing power0.1229 TFLOPS4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1Ring Bus
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 28 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
Intel Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 392 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 11 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.