ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1137not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.31no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1R420
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)21 September 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed320 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.2008.000
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPSno data
ROPs216
TMUs1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.32.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 21 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and All-In-Wonder X800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder X800 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
ATI All-In-Wonder X800 XT
All-In-Wonder X800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 445 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder X800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or All-In-Wonder X800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.