Tesla T4 vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with Tesla T4, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.42

T4 outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 5538% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1322264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.05
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBraswellTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2016 (10 years ago)13 September 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores122560
Core clock speed320 MHz585 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data254.4
Floating-point processing powerno data8.141 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−5525%
450−500
+5525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
Valorant 27−30
−5456%
1500−1550
+5456%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−5525%
900−950
+5525%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Dota 2 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5500%
280−290
+5500%
Valorant 27−30
−5456%
1500−1550
+5456%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Dota 2 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−4900%
350−400
+4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5500%
280−290
+5500%
Valorant 27−30
−5456%
1500−1550
+5456%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5233%
160−170
+5233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−5400%
220−230
+5400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−5257%
750−800
+5257%
Valorant 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and Tesla T4 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla T4 is 5525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 23.68
Recency 1 April 2016 13 September 2018
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

Tesla T4 has a 5538% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla T4 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while Tesla T4 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 260 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 270 votes

Rate Tesla T4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Tesla T4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.