Tesla M40 vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with Tesla M40, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.42

M40 outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 5719% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1322258
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.53
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameBraswellGM200
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2016 (10 years ago)10 November 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores123072
Core clock speed320 MHz948 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1112 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data213.5
Floating-point processing powerno data6.832 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
L1 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-5.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−5525%
450−500
+5525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
Valorant 27−30
−5641%
1550−1600
+5641%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−5525%
900−950
+5525%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Dota 2 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5700%
290−300
+5700%
Valorant 27−30
−5641%
1550−1600
+5641%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Dota 2 10−11
−5400%
550−600
+5400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−5614%
400−450
+5614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5700%
290−300
+5700%
Valorant 27−30
−5641%
1550−1600
+5641%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5567%
170−180
+5567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−5650%
230−240
+5650%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−5614%
800−850
+5614%
Valorant 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and Tesla M40 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla M40 is 5525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 24.44
Recency 1 April 2016 10 November 2015
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla M40, on the other hand, has a 5719% higher aggregate performance score.

The Tesla M40 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 260 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 92 votes

Rate Tesla M40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Tesla M40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.