Radeon RX 9070 XT vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with Radeon RX 9070 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.38

RX 9070 XT outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 15624% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data60.02
Power efficiencyno data15.62
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameBraswellNavi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)6 March 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores124096
Core clock speed320 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz2970 MHz
Number of transistorsno data53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data304 Watt
Texture fill rateno data760.3
Floating-point processing powerno data48.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−15525%
1250−1300
+15525%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data0.48

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−9900%
200−210
+9900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16100%
160−170
+16100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−9900%
200−210
+9900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16100%
160−170
+16100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8367%
250−260
+8367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
Valorant 27−30
−1244%
350−400
+1244%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−9900%
200−210
+9900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1753%
270−280
+1753%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16100%
160−170
+16100%
Dota 2 10−11
−15400%
1550−1600
+15400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8367%
250−260
+8367%
Metro Exodus 0−1 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6625%
260−270
+6625%
Valorant 27−30
−1244%
350−400
+1244%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−16100%
160−170
+16100%
Dota 2 10−11
−15400%
1550−1600
+15400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−8367%
250−260
+8367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2429%
170−180
+2429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6625%
260−270
+6625%
Valorant 27−30
−1244%
350−400
+1244%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−49600%
450−500
+49600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4275%
170−180
+4275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 90−95
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−21700%
210−220
+21700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 150−160

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−947%
150−160
+947%
Valorant 3−4
−10933%
300−350
+10933%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−10100%
100−110
+10100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Far Cry 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 15525% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 49600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is ahead in 27 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 59.75
Recency 1 April 2016 6 March 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

RX 9070 XT has a 15623.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 9070 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 246 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 939 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.