Radeon PRO V710 vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.44

PRO V710 outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by a whopping 7400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1283182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.90
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameBraswellNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2016 (9 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores123456
Core clock speed320 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data28 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−7400%
600−650
+7400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
Valorant 27−30
−7307%
2000−2050
+7307%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−7233%
1100−1150
+7233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Dota 2 10−11
−7400%
750−800
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Valorant 27−30
−7307%
2000−2050
+7307%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Dota 2 10−11
−7400%
750−800
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Valorant 27−30
−7307%
2000−2050
+7307%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−7400%
1200−1250
+7400%
Valorant 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 7400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 33.00
Recency 1 April 2016 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

PRO V710 has a 7400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 248 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.